The question of whether DeepSeek's AI is a brand-new secondhand ChatGPT arises from a recent study by Copyleaks, which found that DeepSeek's AI-generated texts resemble OpenAI's ChatGPT by 74.2%. This similarity does not necessarily imply that DeepSeek's AI is a direct copy of ChatGPT, but it raises concerns about potential copyright infringement and intellectual property rights issues.
Key Points
-
The study by Copyleaks used algorithmic classifiers to identify a strong stylistic similarity between DeepSeek and OpenAI's models, which was not observed with other models.
-
OpenAI has accused DeepSeek of using "distillation" to train its models, leveraging pre-existing outputs from OpenAI's models to reduce training costs. This method involves using the output of a larger model to train a smaller one, which can significantly reduce the cost and complexity of developing AI models.
-
Despite the similarities in output, DeepSeek and ChatGPT have distinct architectures and strengths. DeepSeek uses a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) approach, which is efficient for technical tasks, while ChatGPT employs a traditional transformer model, excelling in contextual understanding and broader applications.
-
DeepSeek is more cost-effective and open-source, making it appealing for developers and those seeking customization options, whereas ChatGPT offers a more polished user experience but requires subscriptions for advanced features.
While DeepSeek's AI shows significant similarities to ChatGPT, it is not a straightforward copy. The use of similar training methods and the open-source nature of DeepSeek's model contribute to its unique strengths and cost advantages. However, the legal implications of these similarities remain a concern, particularly regarding intellectual property rights and copyright infringement.